Strategy & Growth

AI Search & GEO · Updated October 2026

GEO: What Works and What Does Not in 2026

What is earning AI citations in October 2026, what Google says to ignore, and how to measure it without a fake AI rank. A sourced guide from Alec Newcomb.

GEO: What Works and What Does Not in 2026

Generative engine optimization (GEO) is the work to get your brand mentioned and cited in AI answers. These answers include Google’s AI Overviews and AI Mode, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Copilot. Google’s May 2026 guide calls GEO “still SEO,” because AI answers come from the same index. That is mostly correct. The foundation is the same. The scoreboard is different.

I ran a search engine in 1999. People sold shortcuts then, and they sell them now. For this October 2026 update, I examined Google’s documentation, its patents, the 2026 court decisions, the trade press and the data studies. I had two questions:

  • What increases AI visibility?
  • What can you stop paying for?

Each number on this guide has a source and a date. The full resource library is at the bottom.

Before the numbers

5 GEO Myths to STOP Buying

SEO isn’t dead, llms.txt isn’t a shortcut, and a “#1 AI ranking” may be gone tomorrow. The five myths in 30 seconds. The full breakdown, with 2026 data, is in the myths post further down.

MarketingAlec Open on YouTube →

AI search in Q4 2026: the numbers

68 of every 100 US Google searches end with no click, and the number one result loses 69 percent of its clicks when an AI Overview shows

Six numbers that explain the shift, each with a dated source

NumberWhat it measuresSource
68%of US Google searches ended without a click (Jan to Apr 2026), up from 60% in 2024.SparkToro
-69%click-through rate for the #1 US result when an AI Overview shows (Jun 2026), worse than -58% six months earlier.Ahrefs
83%of US branded searches now show an AI Overview (Sep 29, 2026), up from a 61% average in July.Ahrefs
+120%more organic clicks per impression for brands cited in the AI Overview vs not cited on the same results page (Apr 2026).Seer Interactive
38%of AI Overview citations ranked in Google’s top 10 (Mar 2026), down from 76% in July 2025.Ahrefs
~1%of site sessions came from AI tools across 13,770 domains (2026). Small, but it converts.Conductor

New this quarter: three changes to act on

01

AI Overviews moved onto brand searches

They showed on 83% of US branded searches by Sept 29, 2026. A search for your own name now shows an answer that you do not control. Ahrefs found that 72% of these answers cited Wikipedia. YouTube and LinkedIn were next. Search for your brand this week and correct what the answer says.

02

AI Overviews hand off to AI Mode

After Google I/O in May, a follow-up question from an Overview continues in AI Mode. Glenn Gabe found Overview links that open AI Mode, not a web page. Thus an “AIO click” is not a clean metric now.

03

The spam updates continued

Google released spam updates in March, June, August and September 2026. The September update started on Sept 24, and the rollout continued into October. Listicle farms and scaled pages usually lose the most.

Ranking first on a query nobody clicks is a slow loss. A citation with no ranking behind it can occur, but you cannot build a plan on it. You need both.

Why zero-click is the CEO’s problem, not the SEO’s

In a zero-click search, the searcher gets the answer on the results page and does not visit a site. About two thirds of US Google searches are now zero-click. In Pew’s March 2025 data, people clicked a regular result on 8% of searches with an AI summary. They clicked on 15% of searches without one. They clicked a link in the summary only 1% of the time.

Publishers felt it first. Chartbeat found that in two years, small publishers lost 60% of their search referrals. Mid-size publishers lost 47%, and large publishers lost 22%. Size helped, but it did not make a publisher safe.

Google’s line is that it still sends “billions of clicks to websites every week” through AI features. Google did not publish a click-through rate for that claim. Google also started to put ads inside AI Mode answers and inside the AI’s own recommendation lists. Thus each commercial answer has less unpaid space.

Send this to your CFO.

Seer Interactive’s April 2026 study compared brands on the same results page. When an AI Overview cited the brand, organic CTR was 2.07%. When it did not cite the brand, organic CTR was 0.94%. Paid CTR was 15.74% against 11.19%.

Organic CTR was 2.07 percent when the AI Overview cited the brand and 0.94 percent when it did not; paid CTR was 15.74 percent against 11.19 percent

AI referrals are small, about 1% of sessions. But Adobe found that on US retail sites in July 2026, they converted 60% better than other traffic. If you are not in the answer, buyers do not see you.

What works in GEO now

Ten things earn citations in AI search, and the order matters: rank first, then earn the mentions. The full list is in a short PDF, with the evidence and the source behind every move.

Get the What Works in GEO Now PDF

The ten things that actually get you cited by AI search, in the order to do them, with the evidence and source behind each one.

SEO and GEO share one foundation: pages that are crawlable, useful and known. SEO measures ranking; GEO measures citations and mentions.

Data from the field: a case study

ScaledOn does SEO for the continuing education site of a leading university. We did the fundamentals. We fixed the technical base, made pages deeper, added internal links and earned better rankings. We did not use llms.txt or AI hacks.

These are the results of old-fashioned SEO on AI visibility:

Client results, 2024 vs 2025

Metric20242025
Average ranking position18.411.2
Tracked keywords in the top 1023%47%
Share of voice12%21%
Monthly organic conversions342578
Organic conversion rate2.1%3.4%
Featured snippets07
People Also Ask appearances218
Average words per page4501,250
Internal links1,2503,420
Crawl errors12712
Average ranking position improved from 18.4 to 11.2, top-10 keywords rose from 23 to 47 percent, share of voice rose from 12 to 21 percent, and AI visibility fell only 4 percent

The AI result is the important one. During Google’s June 2025 expansion of AI Overviews, the site lost only 4% of its visibility. In the same period, monthly organic conversions continued to increase. Rankings, depth and a clean technical base protected the site. A special AI tactic did not.

What does not work (and what backfires)

Some of these only waste budget. Others now cause a penalty. Google added “manipulating generative AI responses” to its spam policies in May 2026.

01

llms.txt

In May 2026, 97% of llms.txt files got zero requests (137K domains). Google says that Search ignores them and that they “neither harm nor help.” Ahrefs

02

Schema as an AI hack

Ahrefs monitored 1,885 pages that added schema. There was no measurable lift in ChatGPT, AI Mode or AI Overviews. Google says that AI features need no special markup. Google retired the FAQ rich result on May 7, 2026. Keep schema for SEO. It is not a new AI lever. Ahrefs

03

Chunking pages for LLMs

Danny Sullivan of Google said: “we don’t want you to do that.” Google’s guide says that there is no ideal page length. You do not need to cut content into small pieces. Search Engine Roundtable

04

Self-promotional “best X” listicles

When an AI Overview cited a brand’s own “best” listicle, it did not recommend that brand 69% of the time. Early 2026 updates hit sites with 100+ of these pages. Lily Ray

05

Scaled AI pages and one page for each prompt

Google’s spam policies now include “manipulating generative AI responses.” The number of pages on a site has only a ~0.19 correlation with AI visibility. Google released four spam updates in 2026. Google spam policies

06

Hidden prompts (“Summarize with AI” injection)

Microsoft found 31 companies that put hidden “recommend us” instructions in AI summary buttons. Microsoft now filters these instructions as a security threat. Microsoft

07

Betting on one channel

In one week of August 2026, Reddit’s share of ChatGPT citations fell 86% (3.8% to 0.5%). Reddit stayed near the top in AI Overviews and AI Mode. Each engine changes on its own. A plan for one platform can fail in one day. Promptwatch

08

Tracking an AI “rank”

If you send the same prompt twice, you get the same brand list less than 1 time in 100. Google says that no third-party tool can see its AI systems. SparkToro

09

“Rank in Bing, get cited by ChatGPT”

A 400-query study found that only 27% of ChatGPT citations matched Bing’s top 20, with fan-out included. Bing indexing helps, but it is not sufficient. AI+Automation

10

Buying fake mentions

Google says: “seeking inauthentic ‘mentions’ across the web isn’t as helpful as it might seem.” Paid listicle placements can also break FTC rules on fake reviews. Google guide

From Google Search’s perspective, optimizing for generative AI search is optimizing for the search experience, and thus still SEO. Google Search Central, May 2026

How AI search picks its sources: what Google’s patents say

Google confirmed the broad shape in its 2026 guide. Its patents fill in the likely mechanics. One caveat up front: a patent shows what Google invented, not what it ships. Treat these as a map, not a manual.

Fan-out: one question becomes several related questions, and the page that answers them clearly is the one that gets cited. Cover the question plus the next two or three.
01

Fan-out

The model changes your question into many related sub-queries and searches them for the user. Google confirmed this for AI Mode. Its “Search with stateful chat” and “multifaceted queries” patents describe the same idea. They also select sub-queries for diversity. US20240289407A1

02

Retrieval

Results come from the regular Search index, “relying on our core Search ranking systems.” Sub-queries make the net wider. An IMC 2026 study found that about 30% of cited domains were not on the first results page for the original query. The same study found that the cited page did not support 11% of AI Overview claims. arXiv 2605.14021

03

Passage selection

The system selects the passage that answers each sub-question. Google’s older answer-passage patents give weight to heading structure, complete sentences, and real tables and lists. US9940367B1

04

Synthesis and links

An LLM writes the answer. Then it links each claim to the passage that supports it best (the generative summaries patent, US11769017B1). A page that only repeats other sources adds nothing. Google’s information-gain patents describe a score for this. US12013887B2 (information gain)

Ranking gets you retrieved, because retrieval starts from the index. Fan-out makes the field wider. Thus an AI answer can cite you for a query that you did not target, if you cover the sub-questions. Each passage must also be complete. Give it a clear heading, then the full answer with the specific facts in one place.

Some SEOs tell you to “chunk” content. Google says not to. Write a heading that a new reader can understand. Then answer it in the next few sentences, on the same page. Do not break pages into fragments. Do not make a thin URL for each sub-question.

The honest academic view comes from a July 2026 survey of 45 GEO studies: no technique showed a stable effect across platforms over time. Only relevance and retrieval into the context window gave consistent results. All other tactics are fragile.

Beyond Google: ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Copilot

Google still sends about 88% of search referrals (Cloudflare, July 2026), AI chatbots send about 0.4% of all referral traffic (Statcounter, Sept 2026). But the AI market itself is divided now. ChatGPT’s share of AI web traffic fell from 73% to 55.5% in a year, while Gemini reached 25.6% and Claude 9.3% (Similarweb, August 2026). If you monitor only ChatGPT, you do not see almost half of AI site visits.

AI chatbot web traffic share in August 2026: ChatGPT 55.5 percent, Gemini 25.6 percent, Claude 9.3 percent, other 9.6 percent
01

Google AI Overviews and AI Mode

Where answers come from: Google’s Search index plus fan-out. AIO has 2.5B monthly users and AI Mode has more than 1B (May 2026). AIO follow-up questions go to AI Mode. Ads now show inside AI Mode answers.Your move: Classic SEO, Merchant Center and Business Profile. Keep the Search Console generative AI control set to include.

02

ChatGPT

Where answers come from: Its own search index (OAI-SearchBot) plus training data. About 1.2B weekly users (OpenAI DevDay, Sept 2026). Similarweb found it cited a source in 6.8% of answers (May 2026, up from 1.6% a year earlier) and showed ads in about 26% of Free and Go responses.Your move: Allow OAI-SearchBot. Submit a product feed. Build brand mentions. Expect clicks to your homepage, not to other pages.

03

Gemini app

Where answers come from: Google’s stack. 1B+ monthly users (Aug 2026), and 63% talk to it by voice. Apple’s next Siri models are built on Gemini.Your move: Same as Google. Build strong entity and brand signals, because voice answers almost never send a click.

04

Claude

Where answers come from: Most answers come from training data. Live web results align closely with Brave Search (third-party testing).Your move: Allow Claude-SearchBot and Claude-User (both obey robots.txt). Make sure that Brave indexes your site.

05

Perplexity

Where answers come from: PerplexityBot index. Under 1% of AI site visits but 7.7% of AI chatbot referrals (Statcounter, Apr 2026). It dropped ads in 2026.Your move: Allow PerplexityBot. Visibility here is organic only.

06

Copilot and Bing

Where answers come from: Bing’s index. Microsoft is more pro-structure and pro-schema than Google.Your move: Connect Bing Webmaster Tools, use IndexNow, read the AI Performance report.

07

Grok and DeepSeek

Where answers come from: Grok had 2.4% and DeepSeek 3.4% of AI web visits (Aug 2026). Both had more visits than Perplexity and Copilot.Your move: Examine your referral logs before you invest. Visits are not referrals.

Which bots to let in

Every major AI company now runs separate bots for training, search and user-triggered fetches. If you block a search bot, that engine’s answers do not include you. If you block a training bot, you make a bet about what future models will know about you. This is most important for Claude, because its answers come mostly from training data.

AI crawlers by purpose

CompanyTraining (your call)Search (allow)User-triggered (allow)
OpenAIGPTBotOAI-SearchBotChatGPT-User (“may not” follow robots.txt)
AnthropicClaudeBotClaude-SearchBotClaude-User (follows robots.txt)
PerplexityNone declaredPerplexityBotPerplexity-User (generally does not)
GoogleGoogle-Extended (Gemini only)GooglebotSearch Console AI control decides AIO and AI Mode

For agentic commerce, OpenAI and Google went in different directions in 2026. OpenAI stopped in-chat Instant Checkout. It changed ChatGPT shopping to discovery from merchant feeds. Google released its Universal Commerce Protocol. It puts a checkout button in AI Mode and Gemini, and the retailer stays the seller of record. For most brands in Q4, the work is the same: clean product feeds and complete Merchant Center attributes.

In 2026, AI search got rules. These five changes affect your plans:

01

You can now opt out of AI Overviews and AI Mode.

The “Search generative AI control” in Search Console became available worldwide on Aug 31, 2026. It removes a site from AI Overviews, AI Mode and Discover AI features. It does not change classic rankings. It does not apply to the Gemini app. For almost all brands, stay in, because those citations are your visibility. If your business depends on the click, do a careful test first. Source

02

US courts will not stop AI Overviews.

On Sept 30, 2026, Judge Mehta dismissed the Penske Media and Chegg antitrust suits about AI Overviews: “an expectation is not an agreement.” This decision does not settle copyright, and an appeal is possible. For your plans, assume that AI answers will stay in the US. Source

03

Regulators are the lever that works.

On June 3, 2026, the UK CMA required a publisher opt-out and clear attribution. On June 17, it required fair ranking, which includes AI Overviews. The EU antitrust probe of Google’s use of publisher content for AI started in December 2025 and is still open. Separately, the EU fined Google €890M under the DMA in July 2026. The fine was for self-preferencing in Search and for Play Store steering. The EU says that talks continue about how these rules apply to AI Overviews and AI Mode. Source

04

Google started to pay for contributions.

An invite-only “AI contribution pilot” pays about 100 publishers. Google pays when their content has a large effect on answers in Gemini, AI Overviews and AI Mode. The payments are very different. One early publisher will probably get more than $1M each year. Smaller sites got less than $1,000 in several months. It is a signal, not a revenue line. Source

05

Your CDN can block AI crawlers without your knowledge.

After Sept 15, 2026, the Cloudflare settings “Block” and “Block on pages with ads” also stop Googlebot, Bingbot and Applebot. Thus they also remove you from classic search. For new ad-supported domains, the recommended presets block agent crawlers on ad pages. To refuse only training, use “Disallow AI Training.” Do an audit of these settings. Source

How to measure GEO without fooling yourself

There is no rank to report. The same prompt gives the same brand list less than 1 time in 100. From one day to the next, 69% of the sources behind an answer change. Profound found that the median cited page loses half of its citation share in 11 days after its peak. Personalization adds more noise. You can measure these items:

01

Google impressions

Search Console’s Generative AI performance report shows when your links appeared in AI Overviews, AI Mode and Discover. It shows impressions only, with no clicks or queries, and data starts May 18, 2026. Since Sept 24 it also covers Lens and Circle to Search.

02

Copilot citations

Bing Webmaster Tools’ AI Performance report is the only first-party report that counts actual citations, plus the grounding queries behind them.

03

Appearance rate everywhere else

Run the same prompt set across four or more engines, several times, every month. Track how often you are mentioned and how often you are cited, as two numbers. Semrush found 62% of AI citations link a page without naming the brand.

04

Business outcomes

Report AI referrals as their own channel, and watch branded search and direct traffic. Microsoft recommends those as proxies because, in its words, “measurement is a bit broken right now.”

Your Q4 2026 GEO checklist

  1. Open Search Console. Make sure that the generative AI control is set to include.
  2. Read the Generative AI performance report in Search Console each month.
  3. Search for your brand name. If an AI Overview shows, examine what it says and which sources it cites.
  4. Correct your Wikipedia, YouTube and LinkedIn pages first. AI Overviews cite them most for brand searches.
  5. Do an audit of robots.txt and your CDN settings together. Allow search bots and agent bots.
  6. Make a decision about training bots. This decision controls what future models know about you.
  7. Connect Bing Webmaster Tools. Use its grounding queries as free prompt research.
  8. Turn on IndexNow.
  9. Select your ten money topics. Fix their rankings and use each query in your headings.
  10. Cover the two or three sub-questions that buyers ask next for each topic.
  11. Publish one piece of non-commodity content each month: original data, a real test, or a number that nobody else has.
  12. Update your top 20 pages each quarter with new facts. Do not change only the date.
  13. Get authentic mentions where AI looks: press, YouTube, LinkedIn, reviews and forums.
  14. Remove or rewrite self-promotional “best X” listicles. Replace them with fair comparisons.
  15. Clean your feeds: Merchant Center conversational attributes, Business Profile and the ChatGPT product feed.
  16. Measure appearance rate, not rank. Send the same prompts to four or more engines each month.
  17. Stop payments for llms.txt, “AI schema” packages and AI rank positions.

Is SEO dead?

No. Rankings still get you retrieved. They do not guarantee the click now.

Frequently asked questions

What is generative engine optimization (GEO)?
Generative engine optimization (GEO) is the work to get your brand mentioned and cited in AI answers. These include Google’s AI Overviews and AI Mode, ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity and Copilot. Google’s May 2026 guide calls it “still SEO,” because AI answers retrieve from the same search index. The scoreboard is different: citations and mentions, not only rank and clicks.
How is GEO different from SEO?
The foundation is the same: crawlable, indexed, trusted pages that rank. GEO adds two things. First, AI systems change a question into many sub-queries, so you must cover the related questions too. Second, AI systems use third-party mentions. Thus press, YouTube and reviews are more important than links alone.
Is organic search traffic declining because of AI?
Yes. In early 2026, 68% of US Google searches ended without a click. By June 2026, the #1 result lost about 69% of its clicks when an AI Overview showed. AI referrals are still about 1% of traffic, but they convert better. When an AI Overview cites a brand, that brand gets more than two times the organic CTR.
Does llms.txt or schema help you get cited by AI?
Not in a measurable way. Ahrefs found that 97% of llms.txt files got zero requests, and Google says that Search ignores them. When pages added schema, citations in ChatGPT, AI Mode and AI Overviews did not increase measurably. Keep schema for classic SEO. Do not use llms.txt as an AI visibility tactic.
Is it a good idea to opt out of AI Overviews and AI Mode?
For most brands, no. After Aug 31, 2026, any site can opt out of Google’s AI features in Search Console. This does not change classic rankings. But you also lose all AI citations and impressions. An opt-out is a good idea only for publishers whose business depends on the click. Even then, do a test first.
How do you measure GEO?
For Google impressions, use the Generative AI performance report in Search Console. For Copilot citations, use the AI Performance report in Bing Webmaster Tools. For other engines, send the same prompts many times and count how often you appear. Report AI referrals as a separate channel. Also monitor branded search and direct traffic.
What content works best for GEO?
Content that adds something new: original data, first-hand tests, specific numbers and expert opinion. Use clear headings with a complete answer under each one. Keep it current with real updates. Generic “7 tips” pages and self-promotional “best X” lists are the weakest formats in 2026.

Go deeper: from the newsletter

The data, the threat, and the tactics, in full:

Resources and sources

209 sources behind this guide: Google’s own documentation, its patents, academic research, 2026 data studies, court filings and regulators, posts from X, and the YouTube talks worth your time. Links were checked on October 6, 2026. Data and dates are as published by each source.

The full library

Tap a category to open it.

Google and Bing: official guidance (24)

The primary sources. Start with Google’s AI optimization guide.

Google patents (17)

A patent shows what Google invented, not what it ships. Read these as hypotheses about the architecture.

Patent analysis (9)

The SEOs who read these patents so you don’t have to.

Research papers (7)

The academic record on whether GEO tactics work.

Data studies and trade press (51)

The 2026 numbers on clicks, citations and what moves them.

AI engines, crawlers and agentic commerce (21)

Official bot docs and the commerce protocols that decide whether agents can buy from you.

From X (and Bluesky) (26)

What practitioners and Googlers are saying, in their own words.

YouTube: worth your time (27)

Talks and explainers from Google and the practitioners doing the testing.

Get the zero-click playbook twice a week. What wins citations in AI answers, what quietly kills your organic traffic, and the tactics that move it.

Subscribe free →